Respect for your privacy is our priority

The cookie is a small information file stored in your browser each time you visit our web page.

Cookies are useful because they record the history of your activity on our web page. Thus, when you return to the page, it identifies you and configures its content based on your browsing habits, your identity and your preferences.

You may accept cookies or refuse, block or delete cookies, at your convenience. To do this, you can choose from one of the options available on this window or even and if necessary, by configuring your browser.

If you refuse cookies, we can not guarantee the proper functioning of the various features of our web page.

For more information, please read the COOKIES INFORMATION section on our web page.


News

Labelling: The Commission is moving towards mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labels

05/04/2022 - François-Xavier Branthôme
In May 2020, the European Commission presented the Farm-to-Fork Strategy, the European Union's flagship initiative for a more sustainable, healthy and fair food system. The strategy combines almost 30 regulatory and non-regulatory initiatives to enable sustainable food production, promote sustainable food consumption, stimulate sustainable food processing and food service practices, and reduce food loss and waste.
The first deliverables of the Farm to Fork strategy have already entered into force, such as the EU Code of Conduct on Responsible Food Business and Marketing Practices, which was published on 5 July 2021, and the action plan for the development of organic production presented last year. Two months ago, the Commission adopted a Communication on a contingency plan for ensuring food supply and food security in times of crisis, which marks a further step towards the implementation of the strategy.

Many others are expected over the next few years. One of the most compelling is a Commission proposal to revise EU rules on front-of-pack labelling by the end of 2022.
Nutrition labelling has been mandatory on all pre-packaged foods since 13 December 2016 (EU Regulation 1169/2011 of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers). However, the way in which nutrition information is presented on the front-of-pack is not harmonised by European law. This information is simply provided voluntarily by food business operators.
However when drafting the above mentioned Regulation, co-legislators agreed that, in the absence of a front-of-pack nutrition labelling system that is understandable and acceptable to all EU consumers, member states and food business operators should be able to develop their own systems, tailored to their consumers. The aim was to gather experiences on how the various systems worked and to decide at a later date upon which was the most appropriate.

 That time has come: the Commission is moving towards introducing mandatory front-of-pack nutrition information via a revision of Regulation 1169/2011.
There are currently several types of front-of-pack labels used in the European Union. These can be divided into four main categories: numerical labels, colour-coded labels, graded indicators and endorsement logos. For instance, Denmark has been using the keyhole logo since 2009, France, Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and Spain have all progressively adopted the Nutri-Score since 2016, and the Nutrinform Battery recently became the official system in Italy.
From these categories, the European Commission will select and propose a scheme as a unique mandatory system throughout the EU. In this regard, the EC published an impact assessment in 2020, followed by a public consultation on 13 December 2021 (open until 07 March 2022), where respondents can express their views and vote for their favourite scheme.

This has already created heated debates among industry sectors and member states. Each existing system has its own calculation methods, which benefit some products more than others: for instance, Parmigiano Reggiano and Parma ham producers in Italy and Roquefort producers in France consider themselves wronged by the Nutri-Score and object strongly to it. Under the Nutri-Score algorithm, products such as these would be classified D or E, while a good rating will be attributed to certain diet sodas as the Score does not take additives into account. Another element of discord is the reference used, which can be per serving, per 100g of food (or 100 ml of liquid) or per reference intake, which would resonate differently with consumers.
The ongoing public consultation is the last opportunity to express official, written feedback before the Commission publishes its proposal. It remains to be seen what will be done with it: while public views and feedback expressed in public consultations are taken into consideration in the decision-making process, the Commission is not bound by them.

Sources: foodnavigator.com
Related articles

Italy launches « frontal assault » on Nutri-Score

12/01/2022 See details

Information to Consumers policy: brief overview

09/12/2020 See details

EU, nutrition labelling and regulatory changes in view of Brexit

09/06/2020 See details

Italy: taking a stand against the Nutri-Score trend?

09/04/2020 See details

Nutrition labeling: the advent of the new prescriptors (part 1)

28/11/2019 See details
Back

________________________________________

Editor : TOMATO NEWS SAS -  MAISON DE L'AGRICULTURE - TSA 48449 - 84912 AVIGNON Cedex 9 - FRANCE
contact@tomatonews.com
www.tomatonews.com

 

 

Supporting partners
Featured company
NAVATTA GROUP FOOD PROCESSING S.R.L.
Most popular news
Featured event
CibusTec
Our supporting partners